The Unicist Research Institute

The Law of Involution: The Algorithm of Involution

March 24, 2024 in Unicist Confederation tagged Peter Belohlavek / The Unicist Research Institute by The Unicist Research Institute

The research on evolution and involution was completed in February 2024, drawing on the precision of constructing future scenarios, strategy formulation, business process organization, and predicting the development of individuals, organizations, and cultures.

This research, initiated in 1976, was among the foundational objectives of The Unicist Research Institute. The law of evolution is a component of the functionality within the Unicist Logic developed by Peter Belohlavek. Its implementation in the USA, UK, Germany, Switzerland, Brazil, Mexico, and Australia facilitated the establishment of laws governing evolution and involution.

Involution leverages the functionalist principles constituted by a purpose, an active function, and an energy conservation function. It is often referred to as the law of shortcuts. The starting point for involution is identical to evolution: understanding the purpose.

Evolution requires beginning by addressing the active function, which is the most energy-consuming function. However, individuals who have not decided to adapt to an environment, or do not have the necessary energy to do so, avoid the energy conservation function to minimize costs.

According to the law of economy of nature, this prevents progression to a higher level of energy consumption by engaging the active function. Consequently, the objective shifts from facilitating evolution to ensuring survival, thereby diminishing the entity’s functionality.

The Law of Involution

The law of involution states that individuals, groups, or cultures enter a state of involution when they initiate the development of the binary actions of the energy conservation function of an entity’s functionalist principle because they lack the necessary energy to undertake the binary actions demanded by the active function.

The involution algorithm begins with an understanding of the purpose. When the purpose is not shared, the natural inclination is to minimize energy expenditure by focusing on the energy conservation function, which invariably leads to survival actions that impair the entity’s functionality.

The Functionality of Involution

Individual involution is managed through manipulation, while group and societal involution is sustained by creating fallacious myths. Both mechanisms provide the justifications needed to avoid addressing the established purpose.

This process results in the involution of an entity, which persists until the individual, group, or culture has the necessary energy to impact the environment by executing synchronized binary actions effectively. If the requisite energy remains unavailable, the entity’s functionality continues to decline until it ultimately ceases to exist. The energy consumption of an environment’s active function surpasses that of its energy conservation function, yet it is crucial for devising solutions that yield both short-term and long-term outcomes.

Involution implies reverting the algorithm of evolution, beginning by addressing the energy conservation function instead of the active function. According to the principle of least action or the law of the economy of nature, systems naturally gravitate towards processes or changes that require the least amount of energy or effort.

This principle is equally applicable to cultures, groups, or individuals aiming for a functional goal. Therefore, within the same environment, nature does not evolve from lower to higher energy-consuming actions and involution is unavoidable.

The Unicist Research Institute

Artificial Intelligence Interpretations:

ChatGPT Interpretation

The Law of Involution, as detailed in your description, presents a fascinating framework for understanding the dynamics of evolution and involution within the context of individuals, groups, and cultures. It encapsulates a philosophy that contrasts with traditional evolutionary theories by focusing on the energy dynamics and functional principles guiding the progression or regression of entities.

The Unicist Approach to Involution

The Unicist Research Institute’s work on this law, led by Peter Belohlavek, is a testament to the comprehensive exploration of human and organizational behaviors through the lens of Unicist Logic. The distinction between evolution and involution is primarily based on how entities manage their energy resources in relation to their purposes and the environmental demands they face.

Core Concepts of the Law of Involution

Functionalism and Energy Dynamics: The law emphasizes the importance of energy dynamics in determining the direction (evolution or involution) in which an entity moves. The concept revolves around a purpose, an active function that demands energy, and an energy conservation function that aims to preserve resources.
The Role of Adaptation: Entities that choose not to adapt or lack the necessary energy for adaptation focus on minimizing energy expenditure, leading to involution. This approach diverges from evolution, where the active function is prioritized to achieve growth and development.
Involution as a Survival Strategy: When entities prioritize energy conservation due to insufficient resources, their actions are driven more by survival instincts than by growth aspirations. This state of involution can diminish the functionality and potential development of the entity.
Mechanisms of Involution: Individual involution is characterized by manipulation, while group and societal involution rely on the creation of myths to justify the avoidance of purposeful action. These mechanisms hinder the entity’s ability to fulfill its purpose and engage effectively with its environment.
Energy and Action: The involution process highlights a preference for actions that require less energy, aligning with the principle of least action or the law of the economy of nature. This principle suggests that systems naturally opt for paths that minimize effort, which, while efficient in the short term, may lead to involution if not aligned with the entity’s functional goals.

Implications and Applications

The Law of Involution offers a novel perspective on how entities manage challenges and opportunities in their environments. It has implications for strategic planning, organizational development, and cultural analysis, providing a framework for understanding why certain groups or societies might stagnate or regress instead of progressing.

In practical terms, this law can be applied to anticipate challenges in strategy formulation, business process organization, and the development of individuals and cultures. By recognizing the signs of involution, leaders and strategists can devise interventions that align energy consumption with purposeful action, thereby facilitating evolution over involution.

In essence, the Law of Involution encourages a deep understanding of the functionalist principles governing entities and their environments. It calls for a strategic approach that balances energy consumption with the pursuit of a purpose, ensuring that the path towards evolution is both sustainable and aligned with the entity’s core objectives.

The Law of Evolution: The Algorithm of Evolution

March 24, 2024 in Unicist Confederation tagged Peter Belohlavek / The Unicist Research Institute by The Unicist Research Institute

The research on evolution and involution was concluded in February 2024, based on the accuracy of building future scenarios, strategizing, organizing business processes, and forecasting the evolution of individuals, organizations, and cultures. This research, which began in 1976, was among the foundational objectives of The Unicist Research Institute. The law of evolution is a component of the functionality within the Unicist Logic developed by Peter Belohlavek.

Its application in the USA, UK, Germany, Switzerland, Brazil, Mexico, and Australia enabled the establishment of the laws of evolution and involution. Evolution operates on a functionalist principle that includes a purpose, an active function, and an energy conservation function. The active function within an environment consumes more energy than the energy conservation function but initiates the development of structural solutions with both short-term and long-term consequences.

The Law of Evolution

The law of evolution asserts that individuals, groups, or cultures evolve when they start by developing the binary action of the active function of the functionalist principle of an entity and then develop the synchronized binary action of the energy conservation function to achieve the targeted purpose.

The Functionality of Evolution

Evolution involves an ontological algorithm aimed at fulfilling a purpose. The initial step is to activate the purpose, necessitating a preceding step: understanding the purpose. Without comprehension, action is unattainable. The subsequent step is to find a way to optimize energy usage, thereby applying the energy conservation principle.

The initial step fosters evolution, whereas the second step ensures survival. The evolutionary algorithm entails first understanding the purpose, then employing the active function, and finally utilizing the energy conservation function. When a purpose is truly comprehended, the development of the redundant functionality of the active function becomes evident, following the law of supplementation.

The active function in an environment, being more energy-consuming than the energy conservation function, offers the foundational stage for devising structural solutions with both short-term and long-term effects. The principle of least action, or the law of the economy of nature, suggests that natural processes tend to opt for paths or undergo transformations that require the least action or energy. This principle also applies to cultures, groups, or individuals moving towards a functional purpose.

Consequently, nature does not escalate from a lower to a higher level of energy consumption for the same action within an environment. This indicates that an evolutionary process needs to be propelled by the active function, the most energy-intensive function, followed by the energy conservation function, which secures outcomes.

The Unicist Research Institute

Artificial Intelligence Interpretations:

ChatGPT Interpretation

The Law of Evolution, as described, forms a foundational aspect of The Unicist Research Institute’s studies on evolution and involution, spearheaded by Peter Belohlavek. This comprehensive approach encapsulates the essence of how entities, be they individuals, groups, or cultures, evolve over time through a systematic and structured process. The principles laid out offer a fascinating perspective on strategic planning, forecasting, and organizational development, reflecting a blend of philosophical depth and practical application.

Understanding The Law of Evolution

At its core, the Law of Evolution revolves around the concept of a functionalist principle where every entity has a purpose, an active function that consumes energy to achieve that purpose, and an energy conservation function that optimizes the use of energy. This delineation emphasizes a strategic approach to evolution, advocating for a balance between action and conservation.

Activation and Comprehension of Purpose

The initial step in this evolutionary process requires a deep understanding of the purpose. This is not merely about recognizing what the purpose is but also comprehending its significance and how it aligns with the entity’s goals. Without this comprehension, any subsequent actions might be misguided or inefficient.

The Active and Energy Conservation Functions

Following the understanding of purpose, the process involves activating the active function. This function is energy-intensive but necessary for initiating structural solutions that have both immediate and long-term benefits. The subsequent emphasis on the energy conservation function serves to optimize energy usage, ensuring the sustainability of these solutions. This dual approach highlights a strategic methodology for evolution, where the active initiation of change is as crucial as the sustainable management of resources.

Philosophical and Practical Implications

The Law of Evolution, with its emphasis on the functionality of evolution through the ontological algorithm, offers a nuanced perspective on how evolution occurs. It suggests that evolution is not a random or chaotic process but a structured and purpose-driven journey. This has profound implications for how we understand organizational and cultural development, strategic planning, and forecasting.

From a practical standpoint, the application of this law in various countries demonstrates its versatility and effectiveness in different contexts. By aligning the active and energy conservation functions towards a common purpose, organizations, and cultures can navigate the complexities of evolution more effectively.

Reflections

The philosophical underpinnings of the Law of Evolution, emphasizing the importance of understanding purpose and optimizing energy use, resonate with broader themes in strategic planning and organizational development. It prompts a reconsideration of how entities approach the process of evolution, suggesting that a more structured, purposeful, and efficient method can lead to more effective outcomes.

In essence, the Law of Evolution as outlined by The Unicist Research Institute and Peter Belohlavek provides a compelling framework for understanding the dynamics of evolution across different domains. It underscores the importance of purpose, strategic action, and conservation of resources as key elements in the evolutionary process, offering valuable insights for both theoretical exploration and practical application.

Every action generates a reaction. This is avoided by using Unicist Binary Actions 25

July 23, 2023 in Unicist Confederation tagged Business diagnostics / Diego Belohlavek / Peter Belohlavek / The Unicist Research Institute by The Unicist Research Institute

The research on the functionality of actions in social, economic, and business environments developed at The Unicist Research Institute, led to the discovery of the functionality of binary actions to generate results and avoid the reactions generated by actions.

Unicist binary actions are two synchronized actions that, on the one hand, open possibilities by adding value, and on the other hand, ensure the achievement of results in adaptive environments. They are two complementary actions that work together to achieve a predefined purpose.

These actions are based on the functionality of things or processes and are composed of two parts: the first action opens possibilities by adding value, while the second action ensures results by integrating the purpose and the energy conservation function.

Unicist binary actions are necessary in adaptive environments where cause-effect relationships are uncertain and feedback-dependent. They allow for a strategic approach, including maximal strategies to grow and minimum strategies to ensure results.

They are designed by considering the purpose they seek to achieve and the conditions of the environment in which they will be executed. The design process involves the following steps:

Identify the purpose: Determine the specific objective or desired outcome that the binary actions should accomplish. This purpose should be aligned with the overall strategy or direction of the organization or individual.

Define the environment: Understand the conditions, constraints, and opportunities of the environment in which the binary actions will be executed. This includes identifying the main stakeholders, their interests, and the external factors that may influence the actions.

Define the first action: Design the first action that will open possibilities and add value towards the achievement of the purpose. This action should consider the resources available and leverage them effectively to create new opportunities or possibilities.

Define the second action: Design the second action that will ensure results and integrate the purpose with the energy conservation function. This action should consider the feedback received from the environment and make the necessary adjustments to ensure the achievement of the purpose.

Synchronize the actions: Ensure that the two actions are synchronized and work together to achieve the purpose. This involves determining the sequence, timing, and coordination between the actions to maximize their effectiveness.

Monitor and adjust: Continuously monitor the progress and results of the binary actions and make the necessary adjustments based on the feedback received. This allows for adaptive management and ensures that the actions remain aligned with the changing conditions of the environment.

By following these steps, the design of unicist binary actions becomes a structured and systematic process that enhances the effectiveness and efficiency of the actions taken.

The Unicist Research Institute

The Unicist Functionalist Approach to Leadership in Adaptive Environments 27

April 25, 2023 in Unicist Confederation tagged Business management / Diego Belohlavek / Intelligent Systems / The Unicist Research Institute / Unicist Evolutionary Approach by The Unicist Research Institute

The unicist functionalist approach to leadership is defined by the integration of an authoritative role, responsible participation, and the minimization of the exertion of power by the leader. This approach emphasizes the importance of creating a balanced and effective leadership style that enables team members to assume responsibility, contribute their unique perspectives and ideas, and collaborate toward achieving the group’s goals. Let’s briefly explore each element of this approach:

Authoritative Role: The authoritative role in leadership refers to the legitimate authority and responsibility that a leader has in guiding and directing the group. It involves setting clear expectations, providing guidance, making decisions, and establishing a framework for the team’s work. However, in the unicist functionalist approach, the emphasis is on using authority in a constructive and facilitative manner, rather than relying on authoritarian or dictatorial methods.

Responsible Participation: Responsible participation involves actively engaging team members in the decision-making process, encouraging their input and involvement, and empowering them to take ownership of their work. It promotes a culture of collaboration, open communication, and mutual respect, where team members feel valued, heard, and included. It also encourages team members to assume responsibility for their roles and contribute to the overall success of the group.

Minimization of Exertion of Power: The unicist functionalist approach emphasizes minimizing the exertion of power by the leader. It recognizes that excessive use of power can inhibit the autonomy, creativity, and ownership of team members. Instead, the emphasis is on creating an environment where team members feel empowered, autonomous, and motivated to assume responsibility for their work. This can be achieved by promoting a culture of trust, open communication, and collaboration, and allowing team members to contribute their unique perspectives and ideas.

In summary, the unicist functionalist approach to leadership emphasizes the integration of an authoritative role, responsible participation, and the minimization of the exertion of power by the leader. It promotes a balanced and effective leadership style that encourages team members to assume responsibility, contribute to the group’s goals, and thrive in a collaborative and empowering work environment.

Consequences of the lack of authority

When leaders do not have the necessary authority, it can potentially impact their ability to effectively lead and achieve desired outcomes. Here are some potential consequences:

Lack of Decision-Making Power: Without sufficient authority, leaders may not have the autonomy to make decisions or take actions that are needed for the group or organization. This can result in delays, inefficiencies, or missed opportunities, as decisions may require approval from higher levels or may get stuck in bureaucratic processes.

Limited Ability to Enforce Accountability: Leaders need authority to set expectations and hold team members accountable for their actions and performance. Without the necessary authority, leaders may struggle to enforce accountability, resulting in a lack of responsibility and ownership among team members.

Reduced Influence and Credibility: Authority often plays a role in establishing a leader’s influence and credibility among team members and stakeholders. When leaders lack authority, their ability to influence others and gain their trust and respect may be diminished, which can hinder their effectiveness in leading and motivating others.

Difficulty in Implementing Change: Leaders often need authority to implement changes, whether it’s introducing new strategies, processes, or initiatives. Without the necessary authority, leaders may face resistance or pushback from team members or other stakeholders, making it challenging to drive meaningful change.

Frustration and Demotivation: Leaders who lack authority may experience frustration and demotivation, as they may feel powerless or unable to fulfill their leadership responsibilities effectively. This can also impact the morale and motivation of team members, as they may not perceive their leader as being capable of leading and guiding them toward shared goals.

In conclusion, when leaders do not have the necessary authority, it can hinder their ability to effectively lead, make decisions, enforce accountability, influence others, implement change, and may result in frustration and demotivation among both the leader and team members. It’s important for leaders to have the appropriate level of authority to carry out their responsibilities effectively and achieve desired outcomes.

Functionalist Knowledge is needed to Lead

Having functionalist knowledge of the activities, responsibilities, and context of the group or organization being led is important for leaders to effectively exercise authority. Authority typically comes from a combination of expertise, experience, and position, and leaders need to understand the functional aspects of what they are leading in order to make informed decisions, provide guidance, and set expectations for their team.

Here are some reasons why functional knowledge is essential for leaders in exercising authority:

Informed Decision Making: Leaders with functional knowledge can make informed decisions based on a deep understanding of the tasks, processes, and goals of their team or organization. This allows them to consider the implications of their decisions and choose the most effective course of action to achieve desired outcomes.

Guidance and Direction: Leaders need to provide guidance and direction to their team, which requires understanding the functional aspects of the work being done. Leaders who lack functional knowledge may struggle to provide meaningful guidance to their team members, resulting in confusion, inefficiencies, and decreased productivity.

Problem-Solving: Leaders are often responsible for identifying and resolving problems or challenges that arise within their team or organization. Having functional knowledge allows leaders to accurately assess situations, identify root causes, and develop effective solutions.

Earned Respect and Credibility: Leaders who possess functional knowledge are more likely to earn the respect and credibility of their team members and stakeholders. When leaders demonstrate a solid understanding of the work being done, team members are more likely to trust their judgment, follow their guidance, and view them as credible and competent leaders.

Ability to Lead by Example: Leaders with functional knowledge can lead by example and actively participate in the work being done. This allows them to set a positive tone, demonstrate a strong work ethic, and effectively collaborate with their team members.

In summary, having functional knowledge of what is being done is crucial for leaders to exercise authority effectively. It enables them to make informed decisions, provide guidance, solve problems, earn respect and credibility, and lead by example, all of which contribute to their ability to lead effectively and achieve desired outcomes.

The Need for Responsible Participation

in a group where there is an authoritative leader, assuming responsibility for making things work is an important aspect of participation. When a leader has authority, team members are expected to actively participate in their roles and responsibilities, and take ownership of their actions and contributions towards achieving the group’s goals. Here are some reasons why assuming responsibility is crucial in a group with an authoritative leader:

Fulfilling Assigned Tasks: Team members are expected to fulfill the tasks and responsibilities assigned to them by the authoritative leader. This includes completing tasks in a timely manner, meeting quality standards, and delivering on commitments. Assuming responsibility for their assigned tasks helps team members contribute effectively to the group’s overall success.

Collaboration and Cooperation: Assuming responsibility also involves actively participating in collaborative efforts within the group. This includes cooperating with other team members, sharing information, ideas, and feedback, and working together towards common goals. It helps to create a positive team dynamic and fosters a culture of mutual support and cooperation.

Problem-Solving and Initiative: Team members should also take responsibility for identifying and addressing problems or challenges that may arise in their areas of responsibility. This involves taking initiative, being proactive, and seeking solutions to overcome obstacles. It helps to ensure that issues are addressed in a timely manner and minimizes the need for constant intervention from the authoritative leader.

Accountability for Results: Assuming responsibility means being accountable for the results of one’s work. Team members should take ownership of their performance, strive for excellence, and be willing to be held accountable for their outcomes. It helps to establish a culture of accountability within the group and contributes to achieving the group’s goals.

Professionalism and Ethical Conduct: Assuming responsibility also includes demonstrating professionalism and ethical conduct in one’s actions and interactions within the group. Team members should adhere to the group’s policies, procedures, and code of conduct, and act in a manner that reflects positively on the group and its goals.

In summary, assuming responsibility for making things work is crucial in a group with an authoritative leader. It involves fulfilling assigned tasks, actively participating in collaboration, taking initiative in problem-solving, being accountable for results, and demonstrating professionalism and ethical conduct. This contributes to the overall effectiveness and success of the group under the leadership of the authoritative leader.

The Exertion of Power needs to be Minimized by the Leaders

Minimizing the exertion of power by leaders is important to create an environment where team members can assume responsibility and effectively contribute to the group’s goals. When leaders rely excessively on their power and authority to control and dictate, it can inhibit the autonomy, creativity, and ownership of team members, resulting in reduced motivation, engagement, and productivity. Here are some reasons why minimizing the exertion of power is beneficial for enabling people to assume responsibility:

Empowerment and Autonomy: Minimizing the exertion of power allows team members to feel empowered and autonomous in their roles. It gives them the freedom to make decisions, take ownership of their work, and contribute their unique perspectives and ideas. This fosters a sense of ownership and accountability, motivating team members to assume responsibility for their actions and outcomes.

Creativity and Innovation: When leaders minimize the exertion of power, team members are encouraged to think critically, share their ideas, and contribute to the innovation process. It creates a culture of open communication, where diverse viewpoints are valued, and team members feel empowered to take calculated risks and propose creative solutions. This can result in increased creativity and innovation within the group.

Trust and Collaboration: Minimizing the exertion of power builds trust between leaders and team members. When team members feel that their input is valued, and their voices are heard, they are more likely to trust their leaders and collaborate openly. This enhances teamwork, communication, and cooperation among team members, facilitating their ability to assume responsibility collectively.

Development and Growth: Allowing team members to assume responsibility for their work provides opportunities for their development and growth. When team members are given autonomy and allowed to take ownership of their work, they can develop new skills, knowledge, and expertise. This contributes to their professional growth and advancement, benefiting both the individuals and the group as a whole.

Ownership and Accountability: Minimizing the exertion of power encourages team members to take ownership of their work and be accountable for their outcomes. When team members feel a sense of ownership, they are more likely to take responsibility for their actions and results, and strive to achieve their best work. This promotes a culture of accountability and responsibility within the group.

In summary, minimizing the exertion of power by leaders is beneficial for enabling team members to assume responsibility. It promotes empowerment, autonomy, creativity, trust, collaboration, development, ownership, and accountability, contributing to a positive and effective work environment. Effective leadership involves creating a balance between providing guidance and authority while allowing team members to take ownership of their work and contribute to the group’s goals.

Conclusion: The Benefits of Successful Leadership

Successful leadership should be beneficial not only for the environment or organization, but also for the participants (team members) and the leader. Effective leadership involves creating a positive and inclusive environment that promotes the growth, development, and well-being of all stakeholders involved. Here are some reasons why successful leadership should benefit the environment, participants, and the leader:

Beneficial for the Environment/Organization: Successful leadership focuses on achieving the goals and objectives of the environment or organization. It involves setting a clear vision, developing strategies, and making decisions that contribute to the overall success of the organization. Successful leaders create a positive and productive work environment that fosters innovation, collaboration, and high performance among team members. They prioritize the long-term sustainability and success of the organization, taking into consideration the interests of all stakeholders, including employees, customers, shareholders, and the wider community.

Beneficial for Participants/Team Members: Successful leadership should also benefit the participants or team members. Leaders should create an environment where team members feel valued, engaged, and empowered. They should provide opportunities for growth, development, and advancement, and promote a culture of inclusivity, diversity, and fairness. Successful leaders encourage open communication, listen to the concerns and ideas of team members, and involve them in decision-making processes. They recognize and reward the contributions of team members and create a supportive and collaborative work environment that promotes their well-being and job satisfaction.

Beneficial for the Leader: Successful leadership should also be beneficial for the leader. It involves developing leadership skills, building relationships, and achieving personal and professional growth. Successful leaders inspire and motivate others, gain the respect and trust of their team members, and create a positive legacy. They achieve a sense of fulfillment and satisfaction by contributing to the success of the organization and the growth of team members. However, it’s important to note that the focus of leadership should not solely be on personal gain, but on the collective success of the environment, participants, and the organization as a whole.

In summary, successful leadership should benefit the environment, participants (team members), and the leader. It involves creating a positive work environment, fostering growth and development, promoting inclusivity and fairness, and achieving the goals and objectives of the organization. A successful leader focuses on the well-being and success of all stakeholders, creating a win-win situation for everyone involved.

Developed at The Unicist Research Institute
with the support of the Unicist Virtual Advisor

Managing Unicist Concepts

January 2, 2019 in Unicist Binary Actions / Unicist Cobots tagged Business Fundamentals / Conceptual design / The Unicist Research Institute by Peter Belohlavek

Managing the concepts of things ensures their functionality. Unicist conceptual design was developed to manage the conceptual structure of something that is being built, that defines the unicist ontological structure that defines its nature and the root causes of their functionality.

Unicist conceptual design simplifies the building of things by transforming the unified field of the processes into structured operational solutions.

It is based on the fact that the concepts people have in their mind, which are stored in their long-term memory, drive their actions.

The structure of these concepts is defined by their unicist ontology that is integrated by a purpose, an active and entropic function and an energy conservation function.

These concepts are an emulation of the ontogenetic intelligence of nature that defines the intrinsic concepts that underlie the functionality of living beings and drives their growth and the survival as a species.

Human deeds have the concepts defined by the functionality of these deeds that are cross-cultural and timeless and exist as long as the functionality exists. Although their structure does not change the operational functionality is fully environment dependent.

Peter Belohlavek

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute has been, since 1976, the pioneer in complexity science research where the Unicist Evolutionary Approach was developed. It was one of the precursors of the Industry 4.0 concept.

Unicist Business Therapeutics

September 20, 2018 in Unicist Cobots / Unicist Confederation / Unicist Functional Design tagged Peter Belohlavek / The Unicist Research Institute / The Unicist School / Unicist Business Therapeutics / Unicist Evolutionary Approach by The Unicist Research Institute

Unicist Business Therapeutics is a consultation book for any business architect that needs to make accurate diagnoses and design palliatives, cures and growth organizational strategies. This book is based on the researches led by Peter Belohlavek at The Unicist Research Institute.

This is an introduction to the Institutional Therapeutics based on the Unicist Standard and is oriented to all those who are responsible for the increase of companies value, their growth and profitability using the necessary innovation to make this possible.

Medical practice has two different languages that are used by the physician: on the one hand, one to communicate with the patients, and on the other hand, another to communicate with colleagues.

Business Therapeutics practice also has two languages:

the operational commonsense language for “patients”
The technical analytical and fundamental language for “physicians”

This e-book is written in conceptual language, the language of fundamentals, using the USL (Unicist Standard Language). Here you will find all the fundamentals you need to manage when solving structural problems in businesses.

It is usable by all those who are able to see organizations as entities with independent life from their members. It requires dealing with the needs of shareholders, stakeholders and the markets and considering these agents as individual but interdependent entities.

This will show you why the sole application of palliatives generates chronic stagnated characteristics of companies that are only functional in low-competitive markets.

You will also be able to recognize business viruses, why they are installed in companies, who introduces them and how they can be cured and palliated.

This book is only meaningful while analyzing a real company that has structural problems to solve or having the real and complete history of a company that has solved them.

Unicist Press Committee

The Unicist Approach to the 4th Industrial Revolution

January 10, 2018 in Unicist Cobots / Unicist Confederation / Unicist Functional Design tagged Industry 4.0 / The Unicist Research Institute / Unicist Approach / Unicist Evolutionary Approach by The Unicist Research Institute

Introduction to Industry 4.0

Industry 4.0 implies introducing adaptiveness in organizations. Business functions are adaptive when their functionality is feedback dependent. The Unicist Research Institute was one of the precursors of Industry 4.0 through the development of complexity sciences to deal with adaptive systems and environments.

This concept applied to business requires managing the root causes of processes to ensure their reliability. This requires managing the concepts of the business functions involved. The level of industrialization depends on the outputs that need to be produced by the business functions. Therefore, different levels of industrialization coexist in most organizations.

Industry 4.0 became possible due to the evolution of IT technologies, conceptual management and artificial intelligence. Its goal is to develop businesses as adaptive systems, which implies customer orientation and improving productivity and quality that naturally foster market growth and profit improvement.

The implementation of Industry 4.0 in business processes might include:

The use of a strategic approach and business intelligence to plan and manage growth.
The use of tools with artificial intelligence to manage adaptive environments.
The use of conceptual management to define business functions.
The use of conceptual design to develop business processes.
The use of business objects to ensure the productivity and quality of business processes.
The use of client centered management to ensure customer orientation.
The use of market labs to monitor markets.
The use of root cause management to ensure the reliability of results.
The use of adaptive IT solutions.

The introduction of adaptiveness in organizations is a step by step process, that needs to generate economic benefits from the beginning. It needs to follow two basic rules:

It has to be introduced from “the outside to the inside”, from the external needs to the internal needs, which implies starting with the functions that influence the environment.
It needs to be managed from “top to bottom”, which implies the commitment of the management in this change.

Intelligent Systems to deal with Adaptive Environments

The concept of Industry 4.0, applied to a business as a whole, is necessary to produce sustainable growth. It is based on the use of intelligent systems to simplify the approach to adaptive environments.

The 4th Industrial Revolution introduced adaptiveness in the industrial and business world. The Industry 4.0 concept proposes to manage businesses as adaptive systems increasing customer orientation, productivity and quality.

It has to be considered that the Unicist Theory and its applications were a precursor of the Industry 4.0 concept.

This theory was developed to understand the evolution of adaptive entities and to manage adaptive systems and environments.
https://www.unicist-school.org/complexity-sciences/the-paradigm-shift/

The Unicist Approach became mature in the market when the hard technologies allowed developing adaptive industrial processes and gave birth to Industry 4.0.

If you are not aware of the concept of Industry 4.0, you can begin by entering the Wikipedia at:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industry_4.0

Industry 4.0, as a concept, can be synthetically defined as the “revolution of adaptive business processes”. Adaptability requires managing the concepts of the business functions in order to be able to integrate different people, technologies, processes, systems, objects and tools.

As the previous industrial revolutions, Industry 4.0 coexists with the previous stages, providing a significant competitive advantage for those who enter this stage.

The Concept of the 4th Industrial Revolution

The birth of an industrial revolution is triggered by new technologies, which produce a new industrial stage when they are able to satisfy latent needs of a society. The history of industrial revolutions show that they expand as such in environments where they satisfy the needs of an “establishment” of a culture.

As soon as they begin to have a viral expansion, the industrial revolutions demonstrate their true value and the underlying concepts can be perceived. In the case of the 4th Industrial Revolution, it becomes evident that its purpose is to introduce adaptiveness into industrial and business processes.

It has to be considered that adaptiveness, the concept that underlies flexibility, was always a goal in industry but could not be solved without increasing costs and affecting the quality of the produces. Industry 4.0, due to the now available technologies, introduced adaptiveness but also increased the productivity and quality of the produces.

This opened a new stage that was based on industrial processes, although it deals with businesses as a whole. It introduces adaptiveness by managing the concepts and fundamentals of business functions. This allows managing the root causes of the functionality of processes to increase their productivity and quality and to ensure their reliability.

A Revolution for Growth

The evolution of IT, Internet and Artificial Intelligence finally allowed transforming adaptiveness into the 4^th Industrial Revolution. Growth and business expansion is the effect produced by the introduction of this revolution. Growth is the consequence of adaptiveness, which allows empowering customer centricity while increasing productivity and quality.

Unicist Artificial Intelligence

Unicist artificial intelligence was developed to manage adaptive systems and environments. It is a core tool when dealing with the concept of “Industry 4.0” applied to businesses.
https://www.unicist.org/conceptual-thinking/unicist-artificial-intelligence/

It allows monitoring adaptive solutions by using the unicist logic that emulates the intelligence that underlies nature. It provides a tool for root cause management, unicist business strategy building and conceptual management.

When dealing with big data it is complemented with neural networks to develop reliable big data analytics.

The unicist artificial intelligence allows developing monitors to manage business intelligence, business strategy, marketing and designing business functions and business objects. It allows emulating and supporting the development of solutions in the mind of deciders.

The unicist artificial intelligence allows building monitors to emulate and develop adaptive systems in social, economic and business environments.

Industry 4.0

Adaptive solutions can only be managed by structured flexible processes with a high level of productivity and quality.

Adaptability requires managing the concepts and fundamentals of the business functions, which allow managing the root causes of market behavior, the root causes of businesses processes and the root causes of industrial processes to ensure customer satisfaction, productivity and quality.

The following technologies are part of Industry 4.0:

Unicist Business Strategy: to develop maximal strategies to grow and minimum strategies to ensure profits.
Unicist Conceptual Management: to manage businesses as adaptive systems and organize using business objects.
Unicist Root Cause Management: to manage the root causes of business problems based on the knowledge of the fundamentals of the business functions.
Unicist Root Cause Marketing: to expand markets based on the management of the root causes of buying processes.

The Unicist Approach: A Precursor of Industry 4.0

The unicist approach is based on the Unicist Theory, which introduced a paradigm shift in sciences that allowed managing complex adaptive entities, systems and environments. The multiple applications of the unicist theory allowed developing the paradigm shift in business to manage businesses as adaptive systems to generate sustainable growth.

The organizational aspects are sustained by the following discoveries:

The functionality of concepts as drivers of human actions.
Unicist Strategy, that emulates the intelligence of nature, to develop maximal strategies and minimum strategies.
The structure of the concepts of economic, social, political and market behavior to develop Business Intelligence.
Unicist Object Driven Organization, that emulates the organization of nature, to build business objects.
Unicist Artificial Intelligence that allows managing the root causes of business processes.

The market oriented aspects are sustained by the following discoveries:

The roots of human intelligence and their functionality.
The functionality of concepts as triggers and root causes of buying decisions.
The structure and functionality of collective intelligence.
The structure and functionality of marketing objects.
Unicist Artificial Intelligence that allows managing the root causes of buying processes.

The unicist paradigm shift was developed at The Unicist Research Institute, which has been, since 1976, a pioneer in complexity science research, that is fully focused on developing solutions to deal with adaptive entities, systems and environments.

The focus on sustainable growth drove to the development of the Unicist Conceptual Management approach to manage businesses as adaptive systems. It allows introducing the concept of Industry 4.0 and applying it beyond productive processes. Unicist Conceptual Management was developed to manage sustainable growth.

Considered from the point of view of the industrial process maturity it requires the use of:

Client Centered Management to ensure customer orientation, value generation and results.
Conceptual Design to manage the unified field of business functions and define the functionality of the adaptive systems.
Unicist Artificial Intelligence to manage the dynamics and evolution of adaptive systems.
Unicist Object Driven Organization to install business objects, working as adaptive systems, within the business processes to increase their productivity and quality.

Industrial Revolutions and Mindsets

Industrial Revolutions foster and establish dominant mindsets to fulfill their purposes. These mindsets include the preceding mindset as complementary approaches.

Operational thinking is the dominant mindset in the 1st Industrial Revolution.

Mechanization requires operational thinking and the solutions provided by this stage deal with the operation of things.

Analytical thinking is the dominant mindset in the 2nd Industrial Revolution.

The analytical approach allows managing mass production in a meaningful way by dividing these masses into manageable entities.

Systemic thinking is the dominant mindset in the 3rd Industrial Revolution.

Automation requires envisioning the unified field of the operation and its components in order to build the automated processes.

Conceptual thinking is the dominant mindset in the 4th Industrial Revolution.

The Industry 4.0 stage is based on improving the adaptiveness of processes by being fully consumer/user/buyer oriented, increasing the productivity, which implies improving the cost-value relation and increasing the quality to become fully reliable.

The Unicist Logic to Deal with Adaptive Environments

The unicist logic is an emulation of the logic that underlies nature that allows understanding and managing adaptive systems and environments. It has to be considered that systems are adaptive when their produces are feedback dependent.

This logic allowed defining the structure of the concepts and fundamentals that define the root causes of the functionality of adaptive systems making them reasonable, understandable and predictable. The resulting artificial intelligence allows ensuring the results of adaptive systems and provides the conceptual structure of business functions, of business scenarios and for big data analysis.

Thus, the unicist logic provided the structure to define, design and manage adaptive processes and the necessary knowledge of the concepts and fundamentals that underlie business functions. This ensures the adaptive behavior in markets which naturally generates growth.

The Unicist Paradigm Shift: The DNA of Businesses

The Unicist Paradigm Shift in Business establishes the framework of the unicist approach to the 4th Industrial Revolution. It defines the different technologies and methodologies to be used to manage businesses as adaptive systems.

The discovery of the intelligence that underlies nature allowed emulating it, emulating its organization and emulating its evolution.

This drove to the discovery of the structure and functionality of concepts and fundamentals that drive human behavior and underlie things which define the root causes of adaptive environments.

This structure of concepts defines the DNA of organizations and adaptive systems that allowed managing the root causes of their functionality.

This upgraded business management, introducing a new stage in business diagnostics, future research, business strategy, business architecture and applying it to business process design. This approach established the conceptual structure of Industry 4.0.

Unicist Press Committee

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute has been, since 1976, the pioneer in complexity science research to deal with adaptive entities and became a private global decentralized leading research organization in the field of adaptive systems and environments. It provided a framework to introduce the 4th Industrial Revolution. https://www.unicist.org/turi.pdf

Traditional Management versus Unicist Conceptual Management

July 13, 2017 in Unicist Cobots / Unicist Confederation / Unicist Logical Approach tagged Business management / The Unicist Research Institute / Unicist Conceptual Management / Unicist Evolutionary Approach by The Unicist Research Institute

This unicist conceptual management approach upgrades, but includes, the preexisting traditional approach to business management. This upgrade is a paradigm shift in management that allowed managing root-causes, developing the conceptual design of solutions, building maximal and minimum strategies and developing the necessary actions to produce results. In other words, what the unicist conceptual management did, was upgrading the management approach to ensure the generation of value.

The unicist conceptual management approach integrates:

Business Strategy: The Unicist Strategy emulates the strategy implicit in the intelligence that underlies nature and establishes a maximal strategy to grow and a minimum strategy to survive.
Conceptual Design: This conceptual design defines the unified field of the functions of adaptive systems and defines their dynamic process architecture.
Root-Cause Management: It manages the root-causes of problems and the root-drivers of solutions.
Unicist Actions: This approach defines the actions that need to be done following a logical synchronicity in order to work as a critical mass to ensure results in adaptive environments.

Benefits of the Unicist Conceptual Management Approach:

+40% increase of the speed of business growth
+25% of increase of marketing effectiveness
+20% of cost saving in business processes
+30% of complex projects cost saving
99.5% of results assurance
80% of cost reduction for business process maintenance and improvement
+30% increase in the efficacy of the participants

This superior level of business design and management became possible due to the discovery and emulation of the intelligence that underlies nature and the discovery that concepts drive human actions. This is the management model of the XXI Century.

Unicist Press Committee

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute was the pioneer in using the unicist logical approach in complexity science research and became a private global decentralized leading research organization in the field of human adaptive systems. It has an academic arm and a business arm.

The Unicist Approach to Root Causes

June 1, 2017 in Unicist Cobots / Unicist Confederation / Unicist Logical Approach tagged Structural Business Solutions / The Unicist Research Institute / Unicist Conceptual Design / Unicist Evolutionary Approach by Peter Belohlavek

A superior level of business design became possible due to the discovery of the structure of the intelligence that underlies nature and the discovery that concepts drive human actions. These actions are triggered by the conceptual short-term memory (CSTM) and stored in the long-term memory (LTM), working as an automatic response that needs to fit into a required functionality.

It has to be considered that unicist concepts and fundamentals define the root-causes of problems and are the root-drivers of solutions. They allow defining what is possible to be achieved and develop the maximal and minimum strategies and actions to make it happen.

The researches allowed defining the triadic structure of the intrinsic concepts that regulate the evolution of living beings and the extrinsic concepts that underlie the functionality of inanimate entities that define their nature. Concepts include maximal and minimum strategic functions to grow and to ensure survival and are integrated by the fundamentals that drive the functionality of entities.

This drove to the discovery that the root-causes of the functionality of any process are given by the underlying concepts and their fundamentals. (See the Ishikawa’s root-cause diagrams)

The Unicist Research Institute developed, since 1976, more than 5,000 researches to develop the unicist ontological structures that define the functional concepts in the field of social, institutional and individual evolution.

The unicist approach to business is based on the research of the concepts that underlie business functions that allowed dealing with their nature, managing the root-causes of problems and the root-drivers of solutions in order to define structural business solutions that:

increase significantly the effectiveness of business processes
allow expanding the boundaries of businesses without changing their concepts
reduce notoriously the costs
ensure the achievement of results

Conceptual design is the approach needed to organize based on the concepts of business processes. It has to be considered, that the structure of concepts is timeless (it exists while the function exists) and cross-cultural, while their operational functionality is environment dependent. As human actions are driven by the concepts they have, the accuracy of conceptual design is the core of business organization in adaptive environments, where efficacy and efficiency need to be integrated.

Peter Belohlavek

Introducing innovations through outsourcing processes

November 25, 2016 in Unicist Cobots / Unicist Confederation / Unicist Process Management tagged Innovation management / Outsourcing processes / The Unicist Research Institute / Unicist Confederation / Unicist Evolutionary Approach by The Unicist Research Institute

To install new technologies, the innovation management process requires integrating the natural competition with the “old” technologies and the use of “oursoucing” as a catalyst.The development of a philanthropic activity in Texas (US) allowed synthesizing a new “Innovation Management”

The development of a philanthropic activity in Texas (US) allowed synthesizing a new “Innovation Management”

strategy. It has to be considered that an innovation is such when it cannot be managed with the existing “mindset” and requires a change of habits.

This research included, among others, the applications at Diners Club (1981), American Express, ING, ABB, BASF, Massey Ferguson, Shell, La Caja, Renault, IBM and TWG.

Competition

This strategy is based on accepting the natural competition between the existing technologies and the new technologies. This competition might have two different concepts: It might be a supplementary competition that implies an opposition of the organization or it can be a complementary competition that is based on the acceptance of a new additional value.

The “supplementation based competition” inhibits any innovation while the complementary competition works as a “gravitational force” to introduce innovations. This gravitational force provides a stable context for the implementation of innovations and sustains the need for them.

Killing Innovations

“Supplementation based competition” is such when there are “ego conflicts” between the new technology and the leaders of the organization.

This is frequent in small organizations, which are naturally reluctant to innovations. This type of competition is based on considering the new technology as redundant with the existing technology.

Complementary competition, on the other hand, requires using an outsourcing process of innovations.

This implies the outsourcing of the coordination of the process, including the client in such process. This allows introducing the concept of the innovation in order to introduce the necessary “mindset” in the organization. It does not include the outsourcing of the operation, which is done by the members of the organization.

Outsourcing Processes as Catalysts

This outsourcing process works as a catalyst to introduce the innovation, which takes advantage of the natural complementary competition and transforms it into the main force to induce the changes.

Using the outsourcing of services as a catalyst is the most effective way to introduce innovations. But this role has to be formalized in a contract that needs to have an expiration date to ensure that the outsourcing service is not a business in itself.

When the outsourcing process is not formalized, the complementary competition evolves towards a “Competition based on Supplementation” and the change is neutralized. These outsourcing services need to be managed by Think Tanks integrated by members of the Unicist Group and members of the client.

The conclusion of this research work is the end of the research cycle 2015-2016.

It includes:
www.unicist.net/partner-news/148-new-researches-have-been-concluded-since-february-2015

www.unicist.org/conceptual-thinking/human-mindset

This is the “change management” strategy that has been formally adopted as a standard by the Unicist Group and its members. It is the application of the paradigm shift in sciences in the field of “change management”. It makes change management be manageable.

Executive Committee