Business management


The Unicist Functionalist Approach to Leadership in Adaptive Environments 27

The unicist functionalist approach to leadership is defined by the integration of an authoritative role, responsible participation, and the minimization of the exertion of power by the leader. This approach emphasizes the importance of creating a balanced and effective leadership style that enables team members to assume responsibility, contribute their unique perspectives and ideas, and collaborate toward achieving the group’s goals. Let’s briefly explore each element of this approach:

Authoritative Role: The authoritative role in leadership refers to the legitimate authority and responsibility that a leader has in guiding and directing the group. It involves setting clear expectations, providing guidance, making decisions, and establishing a framework for the team’s work. However, in the unicist functionalist approach, the emphasis is on using authority in a constructive and facilitative manner, rather than relying on authoritarian or dictatorial methods.

Responsible Participation: Responsible participation involves actively engaging team members in the decision-making process, encouraging their input and involvement, and empowering them to take ownership of their work. It promotes a culture of collaboration, open communication, and mutual respect, where team members feel valued, heard, and included. It also encourages team members to assume responsibility for their roles and contribute to the overall success of the group.

Minimization of Exertion of Power: The unicist functionalist approach emphasizes minimizing the exertion of power by the leader. It recognizes that excessive use of power can inhibit the autonomy, creativity, and ownership of team members. Instead, the emphasis is on creating an environment where team members feel empowered, autonomous, and motivated to assume responsibility for their work. This can be achieved by promoting a culture of trust, open communication, and collaboration, and allowing team members to contribute their unique perspectives and ideas.

In summary, the unicist functionalist approach to leadership emphasizes the integration of an authoritative role, responsible participation, and the minimization of the exertion of power by the leader. It promotes a balanced and effective leadership style that encourages team members to assume responsibility, contribute to the group’s goals, and thrive in a collaborative and empowering work environment.

Consequences of the lack of authority

When leaders do not have the necessary authority, it can potentially impact their ability to effectively lead and achieve desired outcomes. Here are some potential consequences:

Lack of Decision-Making Power: Without sufficient authority, leaders may not have the autonomy to make decisions or take actions that are needed for the group or organization. This can result in delays, inefficiencies, or missed opportunities, as decisions may require approval from higher levels or may get stuck in bureaucratic processes.

Limited Ability to Enforce Accountability: Leaders need authority to set expectations and hold team members accountable for their actions and performance. Without the necessary authority, leaders may struggle to enforce accountability, resulting in a lack of responsibility and ownership among team members.

Reduced Influence and Credibility: Authority often plays a role in establishing a leader’s influence and credibility among team members and stakeholders. When leaders lack authority, their ability to influence others and gain their trust and respect may be diminished, which can hinder their effectiveness in leading and motivating others.

Difficulty in Implementing Change: Leaders often need authority to implement changes, whether it’s introducing new strategies, processes, or initiatives. Without the necessary authority, leaders may face resistance or pushback from team members or other stakeholders, making it challenging to drive meaningful change.

Frustration and Demotivation: Leaders who lack authority may experience frustration and demotivation, as they may feel powerless or unable to fulfill their leadership responsibilities effectively. This can also impact the morale and motivation of team members, as they may not perceive their leader as being capable of leading and guiding them toward shared goals.

In conclusion, when leaders do not have the necessary authority, it can hinder their ability to effectively lead, make decisions, enforce accountability, influence others, implement change, and may result in frustration and demotivation among both the leader and team members. It’s important for leaders to have the appropriate level of authority to carry out their responsibilities effectively and achieve desired outcomes.

Functionalist Knowledge is needed to Lead

Having functionalist knowledge of the activities, responsibilities, and context of the group or organization being led is important for leaders to effectively exercise authority. Authority typically comes from a combination of expertise, experience, and position, and leaders need to understand the functional aspects of what they are leading in order to make informed decisions, provide guidance, and set expectations for their team.

Here are some reasons why functional knowledge is essential for leaders in exercising authority:

Informed Decision Making: Leaders with functional knowledge can make informed decisions based on a deep understanding of the tasks, processes, and goals of their team or organization. This allows them to consider the implications of their decisions and choose the most effective course of action to achieve desired outcomes.

Guidance and Direction: Leaders need to provide guidance and direction to their team, which requires understanding the functional aspects of the work being done. Leaders who lack functional knowledge may struggle to provide meaningful guidance to their team members, resulting in confusion, inefficiencies, and decreased productivity.

Problem-Solving: Leaders are often responsible for identifying and resolving problems or challenges that arise within their team or organization. Having functional knowledge allows leaders to accurately assess situations, identify root causes, and develop effective solutions.

Earned Respect and Credibility: Leaders who possess functional knowledge are more likely to earn the respect and credibility of their team members and stakeholders. When leaders demonstrate a solid understanding of the work being done, team members are more likely to trust their judgment, follow their guidance, and view them as credible and competent leaders.

Ability to Lead by Example: Leaders with functional knowledge can lead by example and actively participate in the work being done. This allows them to set a positive tone, demonstrate a strong work ethic, and effectively collaborate with their team members.

In summary, having functional knowledge of what is being done is crucial for leaders to exercise authority effectively. It enables them to make informed decisions, provide guidance, solve problems, earn respect and credibility, and lead by example, all of which contribute to their ability to lead effectively and achieve desired outcomes.

The Need for Responsible Participation

in a group where there is an authoritative leader, assuming responsibility for making things work is an important aspect of participation. When a leader has authority, team members are expected to actively participate in their roles and responsibilities, and take ownership of their actions and contributions towards achieving the group’s goals. Here are some reasons why assuming responsibility is crucial in a group with an authoritative leader:

Fulfilling Assigned Tasks: Team members are expected to fulfill the tasks and responsibilities assigned to them by the authoritative leader. This includes completing tasks in a timely manner, meeting quality standards, and delivering on commitments. Assuming responsibility for their assigned tasks helps team members contribute effectively to the group’s overall success.

Collaboration and Cooperation: Assuming responsibility also involves actively participating in collaborative efforts within the group. This includes cooperating with other team members, sharing information, ideas, and feedback, and working together towards common goals. It helps to create a positive team dynamic and fosters a culture of mutual support and cooperation.

Problem-Solving and Initiative: Team members should also take responsibility for identifying and addressing problems or challenges that may arise in their areas of responsibility. This involves taking initiative, being proactive, and seeking solutions to overcome obstacles. It helps to ensure that issues are addressed in a timely manner and minimizes the need for constant intervention from the authoritative leader.

Accountability for Results: Assuming responsibility means being accountable for the results of one’s work. Team members should take ownership of their performance, strive for excellence, and be willing to be held accountable for their outcomes. It helps to establish a culture of accountability within the group and contributes to achieving the group’s goals.

Professionalism and Ethical Conduct: Assuming responsibility also includes demonstrating professionalism and ethical conduct in one’s actions and interactions within the group. Team members should adhere to the group’s policies, procedures, and code of conduct, and act in a manner that reflects positively on the group and its goals.

In summary, assuming responsibility for making things work is crucial in a group with an authoritative leader. It involves fulfilling assigned tasks, actively participating in collaboration, taking initiative in problem-solving, being accountable for results, and demonstrating professionalism and ethical conduct. This contributes to the overall effectiveness and success of the group under the leadership of the authoritative leader.

The Exertion of Power needs to be Minimized by the Leaders

Minimizing the exertion of power by leaders is important to create an environment where team members can assume responsibility and effectively contribute to the group’s goals. When leaders rely excessively on their power and authority to control and dictate, it can inhibit the autonomy, creativity, and ownership of team members, resulting in reduced motivation, engagement, and productivity. Here are some reasons why minimizing the exertion of power is beneficial for enabling people to assume responsibility:

Empowerment and Autonomy: Minimizing the exertion of power allows team members to feel empowered and autonomous in their roles. It gives them the freedom to make decisions, take ownership of their work, and contribute their unique perspectives and ideas. This fosters a sense of ownership and accountability, motivating team members to assume responsibility for their actions and outcomes.

Creativity and Innovation: When leaders minimize the exertion of power, team members are encouraged to think critically, share their ideas, and contribute to the innovation process. It creates a culture of open communication, where diverse viewpoints are valued, and team members feel empowered to take calculated risks and propose creative solutions. This can result in increased creativity and innovation within the group.

Trust and Collaboration: Minimizing the exertion of power builds trust between leaders and team members. When team members feel that their input is valued, and their voices are heard, they are more likely to trust their leaders and collaborate openly. This enhances teamwork, communication, and cooperation among team members, facilitating their ability to assume responsibility collectively.

Development and Growth: Allowing team members to assume responsibility for their work provides opportunities for their development and growth. When team members are given autonomy and allowed to take ownership of their work, they can develop new skills, knowledge, and expertise. This contributes to their professional growth and advancement, benefiting both the individuals and the group as a whole.

Ownership and Accountability: Minimizing the exertion of power encourages team members to take ownership of their work and be accountable for their outcomes. When team members feel a sense of ownership, they are more likely to take responsibility for their actions and results, and strive to achieve their best work. This promotes a culture of accountability and responsibility within the group.

In summary, minimizing the exertion of power by leaders is beneficial for enabling team members to assume responsibility. It promotes empowerment, autonomy, creativity, trust, collaboration, development, ownership, and accountability, contributing to a positive and effective work environment. Effective leadership involves creating a balance between providing guidance and authority while allowing team members to take ownership of their work and contribute to the group’s goals.

Conclusion: The Benefits of Successful Leadership

Successful leadership should be beneficial not only for the environment or organization, but also for the participants (team members) and the leader. Effective leadership involves creating a positive and inclusive environment that promotes the growth, development, and well-being of all stakeholders involved. Here are some reasons why successful leadership should benefit the environment, participants, and the leader:

Beneficial for the Environment/Organization: Successful leadership focuses on achieving the goals and objectives of the environment or organization. It involves setting a clear vision, developing strategies, and making decisions that contribute to the overall success of the organization. Successful leaders create a positive and productive work environment that fosters innovation, collaboration, and high performance among team members. They prioritize the long-term sustainability and success of the organization, taking into consideration the interests of all stakeholders, including employees, customers, shareholders, and the wider community.

Beneficial for Participants/Team Members: Successful leadership should also benefit the participants or team members. Leaders should create an environment where team members feel valued, engaged, and empowered. They should provide opportunities for growth, development, and advancement, and promote a culture of inclusivity, diversity, and fairness. Successful leaders encourage open communication, listen to the concerns and ideas of team members, and involve them in decision-making processes. They recognize and reward the contributions of team members and create a supportive and collaborative work environment that promotes their well-being and job satisfaction.

Beneficial for the Leader: Successful leadership should also be beneficial for the leader. It involves developing leadership skills, building relationships, and achieving personal and professional growth. Successful leaders inspire and motivate others, gain the respect and trust of their team members, and create a positive legacy. They achieve a sense of fulfillment and satisfaction by contributing to the success of the organization and the growth of team members. However, it’s important to note that the focus of leadership should not solely be on personal gain, but on the collective success of the environment, participants, and the organization as a whole.

In summary, successful leadership should benefit the environment, participants (team members), and the leader. It involves creating a positive work environment, fostering growth and development, promoting inclusivity and fairness, and achieving the goals and objectives of the organization. A successful leader focuses on the well-being and success of all stakeholders, creating a win-win situation for everyone involved.

Developed at The Unicist Research Institute
with the support of the Unicist Virtual Advisor

Share

Traditional Management versus Unicist Conceptual Management

This unicist conceptual management approach upgrades, but includes, the preexisting traditional approach to business management. This upgrade is a paradigm shift in management that allowed managing root-causes, developing the conceptual design of solutions, building maximal and minimum strategies and developing the necessary actions to produce results. In other words, what the unicist conceptual management did, was upgrading the management approach to ensure the generation of value.

Traditional Management vs Unicist Conceptual Management

The unicist conceptual management approach integrates:

  1. Business Strategy: The Unicist Strategy emulates the strategy implicit in the intelligence that underlies nature and establishes a maximal strategy to grow and a minimum strategy to survive.
  2. Conceptual Design: This conceptual design defines the unified field of the functions of adaptive systems and defines their dynamic process architecture.
  3. Root-Cause Management: It manages the root-causes of problems and the root-drivers of solutions.
  4. Unicist Actions: This approach defines the actions that need to be done following a logical synchronicity in order to work as a critical mass to ensure results in adaptive environments.

Benefits of the Unicist Conceptual Management Approach:

  • +40% increase of the speed of business growth
  • +25% of increase of marketing effectiveness
  • +20% of cost saving in business processes
  • +30% of complex projects cost saving
  • 99.5% of results assurance
  • 80% of cost reduction for business process maintenance and improvement
  • +30% increase in the efficacy of the participants

This superior level of business design and management became possible due to the discovery and emulation of the intelligence that underlies nature and the discovery that concepts drive human actions. This is the management model of the XXI Century.

Unicist Press Committee

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute was the pioneer in using the unicist logical approach in complexity science research and became a private global decentralized leading research organization in the field of human adaptive systems. It has an academic arm and a business arm.

Share

Client Centered Management: the model to grow using Maximal Strategies

Client Centered Management is a model that catalyzes market expansion processes. It is part of the unicist natural organization model. The natural organization is a meta-model in itself that integrates the organization that is needed for the business and the market, the client orientation and the personalization of the work processes.

Client Centered ManagementClient Centered Management needs to be established to drive actions towards the end client and then the personal organization needs to be used in order to ensure the fulfillment of the organizational roles.

The functionality of the Client Centered Management model is driven and catalyzed by the use of business objects that save energy and make processes simpler and more effective.

You can access the unicist logical approach to businesses at:
http://www.unicist.org/repo/#Unicist

Thus CCM is the natural model for business expansion. It has to be considered that it requires business objects driven processes and a role model that allows managing responsibilities.

CCM uses Object Driven Organization

Nature, as a paradigmatic complex adaptive system, is organized by objects. The unicist organizational approach is based on emulating nature to manage businesses as adaptive systems.

The unicist object driven organization is the natural way to organize based on the knowledge of the ontogenetic maps of a business and its functions. It implies integrating business objects in the business processes that allow managing the adaptive aspects of businesses accelerating processes while saving energy.

Object driven marketing, object driven strategy, object driven management, object driven continuous improvement, object driven negotiation and object driven leadership are paradigmatic examples of the object driven organization.

This worked well when the influence of the actions allowed dominating the environment and failed when this was not the case.

CCM is a management model that was developed to establish the rules for an optimum use of the company’s energy so as to satisfy its internal and external clients and catalyze business expansion. When talking about the external client in the company we necessarily refer to the customer and the shareholder. CCM is a meta-model to provide result-assurance, client orientation and secure added value to an organization. It is the natural model to expand businesses.

Diana Belohlavek

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute was the pioneer in using the unicist logical approach in complexity science research and became a private global decentralized leading research organization in the field of human adaptive systems. It has an academic arm and a business arm. http://www.unicist.org/repo/index.php#Unicist

Share

Cooperation Building is a Key Driver for Value Generation

Cooperation is defined as the building of a common space of complementation in which the expansion of the boundaries of the participants becomes possible, while the individual limits of the members are respected.

The driver of cooperation building is the need to generate additional value. This requires an extreme focus on the results that need to be produced, using an integrative logic to integrate the needs of the participants and the external goals to be achieved.

Therefore, the generation of additional added value is part of the nature of cooperative environments.

Cooperation is based on human gregarious instinct and is natural between groups of people who have decided to expand their boundaries.

It is easily observable in the cooperation of countries and organizations of any kind. It adopts many shapes: collaboration, alliances, federations, confederations, etc.

Cooperation is not feasible in extreme individualistic or involving environments. In these environments competitiveness becomes extreme and cooperation is seen as a weakness.

This is a paradox that condemns these types of environments to live in a stagnated context with endless conflicts and/or conflict avoidance actions.

Diego Belohlavek

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute was the pioneer in using the unicist logical approach in complexity science research and became a private global decentralized leading research organization in the field of human adaptive systems. It has an academic arm and a business arm. http://www.unicist.org/repo/index.php#Unicist

Share

The Unicist Ontology of the Functionality of Words

Interpersonal written or spoken language requires the use of words which, according to their meaning, define the functionality of communication.

This description explains the functionality implicit in the use of words. The results of this research help individuals to diagnose reality based on the facts implicit in what is said.

Conceptually, based on their meaning, there are four different “types” of words:

1) Empty words: are those words that have no rational meaning in the context they are being used. They have multiple non structured meanings with no shareable purpose. Adjectives with no adverbial function are empty words.

2) Hollow words: are those words that are able to integrate in a unique sense the meanings given to them by emitters and receivers. In these words there is an implicit tacit purpose underlying.

3) Full words: are the words with a unique irrefutable meaning for those involved in a communication process. They are the solid container where hollow words fit in.

4) Ambiguous words: are the words having two different excluding meanings. One of the meanings is functional to the communication process and the other is dysfunctional.

A communication process needs fulfill the following steps:

  1. Ritual
  2. Management of the implicit conflict
  3. Stimulation of the activity
  4. Pastime action

Peter Belohlavek

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute was the pioneer in using the unicist logical approach in complexity science research and became a private global decentralized leading research organization in the field of human adaptive systems. It has an academic arm and a business arm.
http://www.unicist.org/repo/#Unicist

Share

Organizing growth: The Power of Confederations

Confederations are the most powerful model to organize structured growth. They were born as soon as human tribes began to fight to broaden their “vital space”.

The Power of Confederations1Confederations appeared to ensure defense and in some cases this is still the reason for their constitution.

But this was only the beginning. Soon they became a model to expand activities.

The confederative model can be seen frequently in the organization of countries, professional associations, unions, sports, highly differentiated franchises, etc.

Confederations must fulfill some basic conditions as a way to expand the activity of a business and their members:

1) They need to have a superior functionality in the segment they deal with.

2) They need to have a superior ethic in that segment.

3) They need to have a strong spirit de corps.

4) They need to be internally transparent.

5) They need to have a stable “currency”.

Having the necessary expansion capacity, a superior functionality and a spirit de corps defines the power of a Confederation. Formal Confederations that are not adequately structured degrade the relationships with their members and with the environment.

Peter Belohlavek

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute was the pioneer in using the unicist logical approach in complexity science research and became a private global decentralized leading research organization in the field of human adaptive systems. It has an academic arm and a business arm. https://www.unicist.net/management/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/turi.pdf

Share

The 10-Year Global Future Scenario of Objects driven Virtual Collaboration

Complementation

The 10-year Global Future Scenario of Objects driven Virtual Collaboration, developed by the Future Research Lab of The Unicist Research Institute and led by Peter Belohlavek, defines the trend towards this type of work organization when some of the following conditions are given:

  1. Extreme specialized solutions are needed
  2. There is a need for time saving
  3. There is a need for timing
  4. Transparency of work processes
  5. Reliability systems
  6. Customer orientation
  7. Quality assurance in work process

About Virtual Collaboration

The communication and IT technologies allowed making the next step in organizational design, integrating personal and virtual collaboration, organizing roles and using business objects, to maximize results and minimize costs.

This is a change in working habits that is extremely valuable to manage the adaptive aspects of businesses.

The virtual collaboration allows developing both internal and external work processes. The introduction of this technology needs to begin with the activity where the productivity increase is needed the most.

Relationship BuildingMarshall McLuhan said: “The Medium is the Message”. There is no doubt that virtual media are less powerful than in-person activities to build personal relationships. Therefore it is necessary to compensate this characteristic with an increase of functionality in the group dynamics.

Functionality is increased by using business objects (that introduce functional adaptive automation into the processes). The use of business objects driven work processes allows increasing the functionality of virtual collaboration processes and building a context of simplicity.

In order to achieve group synergy, it is required that the group follows a protocol that establishes the rules of actions and the distribution of credits for its members.

It has to be considered that the bond established between the members of a group is basic to provide a collaboration context that allows achieving synergy and thus increases the productivity.

The fundamentals of this bond are given by the complementation between the members, the functionality of each role and the personal link between the members.

The drivers of this trend are:

  1. The use of virtual collaboration at a personal level on Internet
  2. The massification of the use of Internet
  3. The use of virtual collaboration by many leading organization such a: Shell, IBM, Deloitte, Google, Cisco, etc.

The new technologies that sustain this trend:

  1. Cloud computing
  2. Audio/Video-conferencing
  3. Data-sharing
  4. Desktop-sharing
  5. Web-conferencing
  6. Imaging technologies
  7. Object Driven Organization
  8. Adaptive IT Solutions
  9. Client Centered Management

Where will Virtual Collaboration be installed as a standard within the next 10 years?

  1. Project Management
  2. Work Process Monitoring
  3. Home Office
  4. Research & Development
  5. Counseling/Coaching/Tutoring
  6. Business consulting
  7. Auditing
  8. IT R&D
  9. Virtual Negotiations
  10. B2B Marketing
  11. Buying Processes
  12. Business Monitoring
  13. Customer Support
  14. Auditing
  15. Corporate Universities
  16. Medical Consultations
  17. Medical Prevention
  18. Medical Monitoring
  19. Clinical Trials

To access the basics on Unicist Future Research please enter: www.unicist.org/sdp.shtml

Subjectivism is the killer of Virtual Collaboration

Subjectivism at work is the prevalence of subjective, ungrounded opinions, which prevail over any foundations that can be installed by a counterpart. Subjectivism implies the need of using distortive perceptions, denial and fallacies to avoid dealing with the actual problems.

Subjectivism is necessarily driven by manipulation which necessarily requires an extreme use of emotional influence to avoid dealing with the functional aspects of reality.

http://unicist.net/economics/manipulation-is-a-long-term-business-killer/

Therefore virtual collaboration requires working in functional environments where the roles of individuals are recognized by the results they can produce and their capacity of teamwork. Subjectivists can use virtual communication but not virtual collaboration.

What is needed to deal with Virtual Collaboration?

There are three aspects of organizations that need to be considered when installing virtual collaboration as a standard:

  1. Client Centered Management, to organize towards the satisfaction of customers and clients.
  2. Object Driven Organization, to use objects and personal roles to introduce functional adaptiveness in the processes.
  3. Adaptive IT solutions in order to provide a framework to sustain the efficacy of the participants.

1) Client Centered Management (CCM)

Client Centered ManagementCCM is a management model that was developed to establish the rules for an optimum use of the company’s energy so as to satisfy its internal and external clients. When talking about the external client in the company we necessarily refer to the customer and the shareholder. CCM is a meta-model to provide result-assurance, client orientation and secure added value to an organization. It is the natural model to expand businesses.

CCM is a paradigmatic adaptive system integrated by multiple business objects.

The core objects are:

1) The Unicist Reliability System

2) The Unicist Scorecard

3) The Unicist Quality Assurance System

The principles that integrate the CCM meta-model are:

1. Divide the processes into client-supplier units

This division aims at determining which operating units have a clear “output” so as to be suppliers and which have a clear “input” so as to be considered clients.

2. Minimize intermediaries

This principle follows the natural concept of “the larger the number of intermediaries, the bigger the entropy”.

3. Services or products received are paid for

This principle makes the organization become more aware of costs and benefits and enables negotiating goals to obtain measurable and predictable results.

Maximal Strategy

4. Each client has only one supplier

The principle that each client has only one supplier defines the role of the supplier which drives towards a solution driven approach and not only a task driven approach.

5. First giving, then receiving

It implies that services are paid for once rendered and not during the rendering process or in advance. There can be grounded exceptions to this in the organization.

6. Delivered out of time is considered undelivered

In practice, it ends up in an incentive system for each delivery on time and a punishment system if the dispatch is made out of time.

Minimum Strategy

7. Every client may change his supplier

The organization’s success is given by its capacity to satisfy the clients’ needs. This obliges the organization to manage the unfulfilled situations a supplier may have.

8. He who needs claims

“He who needs claims” is a principle based on the KANBAN approach which is closely associated with the natural tendency of satisfying one’s own needs.

9. Each supplier counts on his client’s trust

One of the basic principles of any successful large company is having a high reliability level. Reliability and trust are “sine qua non” principles for CCM’s application.

2) The Object Driven Organization

The unicist organizational approach is based on emulating nature in organizations. An extremely effective organization can be developed integrating both structural aspects that sustain evolution and incidental aspects that allow dealing with conjunctures. Emulating nature implies integrating the abstract apprehension of reality with the concrete operational design.

Object Driven OrganizationA unicist object driven organization is a result driven model that, according to the predefined objectives, designs the necessary processes and uses and reuses business objects to produce the expected results.

The object driven organization requires having a high level of maturity in business. It can be defined as the organization of processes and the use of objects to achieve the objectives that have been established in a strategy.

An object driven organization implies the development of a maximal strategy that includes the design of processes based on taxonomic procedures to put them into action and also a shared vision that makes these processes consistent with the business.

The vision of the organization is the catalyst of the minimum strategy. If it does not achieve its threshold, it works as an inhibitor of the minimum strategy and destroys the organization. The minimum strategy is based on the use and reuse of objects within the context of methodic procedures to ensure their use and functionality. This is sustained by an action plan (a “to do” list) to guarantee the fulfillment of the minimum strategy.

The use of business objects structures the timing and synchronicity of business processes. It also provides the necessary acceleration to achieve the needed critical mass and the required speed to adapt to the environment.

Types of Business Objects

There are five business objects which are: the drivers, the entropy inhibitors, the inhibitors, the catalysts and the gravitational objects.

Objects’ FunctionalityThe first three ones belong to the process of a system while the catalysts are part of the restricted context and the gravitational objects belong to the wide context of a system.

Objects can be designed integrating these three functions as part of their functionality or they can exist as three different objects to provide the driving, inhibiting and entropy inhibiting functions in a process.

Catalysts and gravitational objects are not part of the system. If one integrates them into the system, these objects do not work as such and destroy the system’s functionality.

The use of business objects requires individuals who understand the business processes in order to use the objects and replace them when their functionality has been exceeded

Unicist Business Objects are provided for the following uses:

  • Driving Objects 
    To drive processes
  • Catalyzing Objects
    To accelerate processes
  • Entropy Inhibiting Objects
    To inhibit the entropy of business processes
  • Inhibiting Objects
    To inhibit dysfunctional events in a business
  • Gravitational Objects
    To influence the results of processes

3) Adaptive IT Solutions

The available IT technologies made the development of adaptive systems meaningful. The objective of building adaptive systems is to integrate software, hardware and peopleware in adaptive work or business processes to assure the quality of the results produced.

Adaptive IT ArchitectureThe development of the adaptive IT  technology became possible because of the discovery of the unicist laws of evolution, the object driven organization that emulates the organization of nature and the drivers of human behavior that allow designing the necessary peopleware.

Before the existence of adaptive systems, the solution was fully focused on the efficacy of individuals, which increased the responsibility of the person who was doing a job. This forced individuals to consider all the details of the feedback from the environment which increased the probability of errors.

The catalyst of an adaptive IT system is its capacity to learn from the feedback to improve its adaptive structural behavior. The entropy inhibitor of the system is given by its capacity to learn to ensure conjunctural adaptiveness.

Adaptiveness is based on the existence of drivers that make it possible. There are different levels of adaptiveness beginning with the most basic and ending with the most flexible. The levels of the adaptive drivers are the following:

  1. There are analogical drivers that are based on the recognition of patterns.
  2. There are rule based drivers that include the preexisting and add rules that correspond to the activity.
  3. There are empirical drivers that include the preexisting and add empirical information obtained using mathematical models.
  4. There are objects based drivers that include the preexisting and add concept based objects as intrinsic adaptive systems.

The integration of the adaptive aspects with the operational and administrative aspects is necessary in order to develop user oriented information systems.

The level of adaptiveness of a system has to be designed according to the characteristics of a work process. Administrative and operational systems can be transformed into adaptive systems by adding and integrating an adaptive interface.

Quality Assurance: The Unicist Standard

The Unicist Standard was developed to sustain the application of the Unicist Logical Approach to Adaptive Systems Architecture and to the building of Unicist Business Objects.

The researches developed at The Unicist Research Institute allowed managing the unified fields of human complex adaptive systems in a reasonable, understandable and provable way.

The discoveries of the ontogenetic intelligence of nature, the anthropological invariables and their evolution, the human ontointelligence and the double dialectical behavior made the research & development and management of adaptive systems possible.

The Unicist Standard defines the ontogenetic maps that have to be followed in an adaptive system in order to structure it and achieve the results that have been defined as possible.

Conclusion

Virtual collaboration is the natural way to organize when there is a need of expert knowledge. Nowadays expert knowledge can be integrated in most of the cases by using the IT technologies that allow sharing data and images.

Collaborative ContextThe time saving and productivity increase is significant when the conditions for virtual collaboration are given. It allows providing full synchronicity with the needs of customers and clients.

But there are several requirements for virtual collaboration to be implemented:

  1. Virtual collaboration needs transparency of work become part of the culture of an organization.
  2. It needs reliability systems that monitor work processes.
  3. It requires customer orientation that fosters fulfillment, synchronicity and reliability.
  4. Personal roles need to be complemented by quality assurance processes to ensure results.

If you want to access more information about this study please contact n.i.brown@unicist.org

Unicist Press Committee

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute was the pioneer in complexity science research and became a private global decentralized leading research organization in the field of human adaptive systems. http://www.unicist.org

Share

The Unicist Standard makes the emulation of nature reliable

The Unicist Logical Approach is a breakthrough that made the emulation of nature in businesses possible. It allowed accelerating business processes and save energy.

The Unicist Standard was developed to sustain the Unicist Logical Approach and the building of Unicist Business Objects. Unicist Business Objects are adaptive systems that are designed to produce a predefined result in a process.

The Unicist Standard is necessary to manage the unicist logical approach in a meaningful way to produce results. The Unicist Standard defines the benchmarks for future scenario building, diagnostics, strategy and architecture that need to be followed.

For those who are entering in the unicist approach we strongly recommend taking into account that the following conditions need to be given:

The person has to be fully responsible for producing measurable results. Functionality has to prevail over subjectivity.

The person needs to be a spontaneous complementation builder to foster synergy and growth. https://www.unicist.net/management/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/nature-of-complementation-en.pdf

The person needs to have decided to use the double dialectical logic to be able to emulate in mind the structure of nature to diagnose, exceeding a dualistic rationalist approach.
https://www.unicist.net/management/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/wp_unicist_thinking_en.pdf

The person needs to have rationally apprehended the Unicist Theory of Evolution in order to be able to understand the dynamics and evolution of the adaptive system where the results need to be produced.
https://www.unicist.net/management/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/unicist-theory-evolution.pdf

Diego Belohlavek

NOTE: TURI was the pioneer in using a logical approach to deal with evolution and became a private global decentralized world-class research organization in the field of human adaptive systems.  http://www.unicist.org

Share

Why use the Unicist Double Dialectical Logic?

The unicist double dialectical logic uses the dualistic operation of neurons to build a mental emulation of the structure of nature that allows dealing with the adaptive aspects of reality, managing the integration of their double dialectical behavior. Unicist thinking is the name given to the process that allows building the double dialectical logic.

Unicist thinking allows emulating in mind the structure of adaptive aspects of reality in order to manage them. It provides the necessary operating system to manage adaptive systems to expand the boundaries of businesses and infer future scenarios in order to adapt to them.

It is necessary to diagnose, build strategies and design business architectures. It provides the structure to understand the fundamentals of businesses and integrate the fundamental knowledge with the technical analytical knowledge to make decisions.

The unicist reflection process: action-reflection-action is the technology to be used to transform dualistic logical approaches into unicist double dialectical approaches in order to define complex adaptive systems. This technology allows starting with the use of disjunctions “OR” and ending with the use of conjunctions “AND”.

It is an upgrade that is up to you…
http://www.unicist.net/clipboard 

Diana Belohlavek

NOTE: TURI was the pioneer in using a logical approach to deal with evolution and became a private global decentralized world-class research organization in the field of human adaptive systems.  http://www.unicist.org

Share

Virtual Negotiations: The Unicist Object Driven Approach

Virtual communication is extremely powerful to develop negotiations if the taxonomy, stages and processes are designed based on the characteristics of the medium.

Marshall McLuhan defined that “The medium is the message”, which can be demonstrated when developing virtual negotiations.

Virtual negotiations structurally differ from personal negotiations because they lose part of the energy provided by the “person to person” processes. Functionality needs to prevail in each stage of a virtual negotiation process.

In virtual negotiations it is necessary to divide the stages into physical divisions. Meaning that each stage needs to be closed, confirmed and matured before starting the next stage. The use of unicist business objects becomes necessary.

This implies a step by step process which demands successive meetings. These meetings are much shorter than personal meetings but need to be preceded and followed by the use of objects and allow preparing and confirming the functionality of what is being agreed upon.

This implies preparing the negotiation using gravitational objects and catalysts. During the meeting it is necessary to use drivers to empower the negotiation and then, after the negotiation, the use of inhibitors and entropy inhibitors becomes necessary.

In the real world there are few people who really can negotiate. Most of the people can buy, sell or make compromises. Virtual negotiation is only possible if both parts have the personal ability to negotiate which is given by their capacity to manage complementation conflicts, authority conflicts and involution conflicts.

The use of virtual media opens the global world to negotiations and saves an enormous amount of energy and costs. It requires respecting the archetypes of the different cultures and negotiate based on the nature of the objectives that need to be achieved.

It is a new stage in business that requires adopting a new technology.

Peter Belohlavek

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute was the pioneer in complexity science research and became a private global decentralized world-class research organization in the field of human adaptive systems. http://www.unicist.org

Share