The most difficult aspect of adaptive system design is its conceptual design. As adaptive systems have to be considered with their open boundaries, they need to be designed considering results as their unique purpose.
This doesn’t differ much from the design of systemic systems but what really makes a great difference is the fact that the definition of the process to be developed has to be considered as the energy conservation function and the input as the active function.
This sounds counterintuitive for most of the designers of administrative systems. Because in administrative systems the input is the energy conservation function and the procedure is the active function.
That is why dealing with adaptive systems requires people who work with these systems, because they need to follow the ontology of evolution, while the development of administrative systems has to follow the ontology of involution.
We strongly recommend reflecting on the difference.
Request more information: email@example.com
Expert System Manager
NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute is the major research organization in the world in its specialty based on more than 3,000 researches in complexity science applied to individual, institutional and social evolution. The applicative researches are based on the discovery of the Ontogenetic Intelligence of Nature and the consequent Unicist Theory of Evolution.