Unicist Ontogenetic Maps


Unicist ontological reverse engineering approach

Ontological reverse engineering is the process of discovering the ontological principles of an object, system or reality through the analysis of its ontological structure, function and operation.

Ontological reverse engineering is the unicist mechanical process to discover or rediscover the nature of an object of reality that is being researched.

It is a technological approach that becomes necessary when dealing with the nature of problems.

It is the basic tool for complex problem solving.

Without being able to deal with the reverse engineering process the nature of problems cannot be approached.

This is the real limit of the problems an individual can solve.

Peter Belohlavek

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute was the pioneer in using the unicist logical approach in complexity science research and became a private global decentralized leading research organization in the field of human adaptive systems. It has an academic arm and a business arm. https://www.unicist.net/engineering/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/turi.pdf


The ontological reverse engineering process

Ontological reverse engineering processes are necessary to apprehend the ontogenetic map of a certain reality that has already been discovered or discover the ontological structure of a function in the real world. This process requires having both technical analytical knowledge and fundamental knowledge integrated them with a unicist reflection process.

Ontointelligence defines the capacity of individuals to deal with complex problems. Ontointelligence is integrated by the individuals’ strategic intelligence, their type of logical thinking and their ethical intelligence.

This defines the focus of an individual’s activity, the value s/he adds to the environment, the capacity to forecast the future and the field in which an individual is naturally successful.

Intelligence evolves when an individual matures. The maturity permits an individual to achieve the maximal level of influence on reality.

Backward thinking implies being able to think from the end to the beginning. Consider a mounting line. It is the capacity of an individual to decompose the final “product” into its components.

When we are talking about ontological reverse engineering it means that in this process the individual is able to find the nature of a specific reality. To do so, an individual has to be able to discover the structure of the nature of that reality.

The ontological reverse engineering process is the basic approach to rediscover the concepts of a reality that have been discovered. And in order to do this, individuals need to discover the components of the “mounting line” that define the final reality until they had found the objects that integrate that reality.

Access the content of the book “The Nature of Unicist Reverse Engineering for Object Design” at the Unicist Library:
http://www.unicist.com/books-pages/en/pr_unicist_reverse_engineering_en.php

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute was the pioneer in complexity science research and became a global decentralized world-class research organization in the field of human adaptive systems. https://www.unicist.net/engineering/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/turi.pdf


Higher levels in organizations require more efficacy

The higher the level an individual is in an organization, the lower the level of external programming s/he has. The lower the level of external programming, the higher the level of knowledge individuals need to have in order to be effective using their efficacy.

WS design needs to consider the characteristics of the position in the organization to define the programming level. WS design requires that people should have the possibility to evolve.

To do so every job should have aspects in which the level of programming is as low as possible in order to allow people to expand their level of responsibility without jeopardizing the quality of the WS.

We invite you to be our guest at the Unicist Library to access the collection of books on Unicist Business Architecture: http://www.unicist.com

Diego Belohlavek
Expert System &
Business Platform Manager

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute was the pioneer in complexity science research and became the major research organization in the world in the field of human adaptive systems. More than 4,000 unicist ontological researches were developed since 1976 until July 2011 in the field of individual, institutional and social evolution. They included the development of the unicist ontogenetic maps (DNA) of institutions.


Characteristics of big changes

Big changes necessarily produce conflicts in an organization. Big changes require all the energy of an organization in order to be implemented. When big changes are necessary it is because there has been a structural change of the environment that made an organization dysfunctional.

Big Change Implementation:

  1. Define the nature of the future situation
  2. Define the nature of the present situation
  3. Understand the real need
  4. Design driving objects
  5. Design catalysts to accelerate processes
  6. Define the implementation taxonomy
  7. Implement change

We invite you to be our guest at the Unicist Library to learn about “Hyperrealism in Business”: http://www.unicist.com

Diego Belohlavek
Expert System &
Business Platform Manager

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute is a pioneer in complexity science research. More than 4,000 ontological researches were developed since 1976 until July 2011 in the field of individual, institutional and social evolution, including the development of ontology based and business object driven solutions for businesses.


The Unicist Object driven Continuous Improvement

The Unicist Continuous Improvement, presented by Peter Belohlavek, is based on the systematic improvement of the business objects that are part of the processes of an activity.

This approach minimizes change resistance and maximizes the possibility of introducing the innovations that are necessary because they are installed in objects and do not affect subjects. The Unicist improvement uses business objects as catalysts within the alternative plans B and C prepared in case plan A is not implemented.

Access or request a Unicist Tweetinar on this subject at:
http://www.academic.unicist.org/unicist_tweetinars.shtml

Learn more about the trend of ontology based solutions for businesses:
http://www.unicist.net/obs.shtml

Press Committee

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute is the pioneering organization in the development of ontology based and business object driven solutions for businesses. More than 3,500 ontological researches were developed since 1976 until September 2010 in the field of individual, institutional and social evolution.


Introduction to the unicist management of Change Resistance

Resistance to change can be produced by the change itself or by the intrinsic needs of individuals. When a diagnosis is made in order to improve a business it produces a change resistance in itself.

It is impossible to avoid that the needs of individual be affected. Understanding the functionality of change resistance will help you to manage the information of diagnoses in order to minimize its negative effect.

While pre-concepts are functional to solve the problems of reality, individuals appear to assume the responsibility of making things happen.

The acid test to evaluate individuals’ responsibility occurs when reality changes and the pre-concepts are not functional to solve the existent problems.

In that case there are three possible alternatives:

Case 1: The individual accepts that a change occurred and that he has to learn how to manage the new situation. In this case, learning takes place. (See Unicist Ontology of Learning and its taxonomy in the unicist bibliography).

Case 2: The individual suffers of innovation blindness and cannot see the change (See unicist papers published on the research of Innovation Blindness)

Case 3: The individual resists the change trying to return to the former state.

Change resistance passes through three stages in order to avoid a change:

1) Dominant influence to avoid change – Stage 2 starts if stage 1 fails
2) Manipulative influence to avoid change – Stage 3 starts if stage 2 fails
3) Destruction and self-destruction to avoid change

Access or request a Unicist Tweetinar on this subject at:
http://www.academic.unicist.org/unicist_tweetinars.shtml

Learn more about the trend of ontology based solutions for businesses:
http://www.unicist.net/obs.shtml

Diego Belohlavek
Expert System Manager

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute is the pioneering organization in the development of ontology based and business object driven solutions for businesses. More than 3,500 ontological researches were developed since 1976 until September 2010 in the field of individual, institutional and social evolution.


Unicist Tweetinar on Ontologies for Engineering

The use of unicist ontological analysis provided the foundations for conceptual design, reengineering and ontological reverse-engineering.

It allowed the development of the ontological structures of engineering processes that allow the building of solutions for complex adaptive systems.

We invite you to participate in a Unicist Tweetinar with Peter Belohlavek on May 17 from 5:00 to 6:30 pm (New York Time) that includes the Unicist Ontologies for Engineering. It will be developed at http://www.twitter.com/uniciststandard

Learn more about the trend of ontology based solutions for businesses:
http://www.unicist.net/obs.shtml

Request more information: n.i.brown@unicist.org

Press Committee

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute is the major research organization in the world in its specialty based on more than 3,500 researches in complexity science, developed since 1976 until September 2010,  applied to individual, institutional and social evolution. The applicative researches are based on the discovery of the Ontogenetic Intelligence of Nature and the consequent Unicist Ontology of Evolution.


Alliances of the Corporate University with Business Schools

From today on Diana Belohlavek will be managing the alliances of The Unicist Corporate University with Business Schools worldwide.

The objective is to develop the Unicist Standard Technology Transfer Programs for individuals worldwide.

The technology transfer programs include:
– Unicist Business Strategy
– Unicist Strategic Diagnostics Program
– Unicist Business Groups

The technologies are transferred to the participants for personal use.

Diana Belohlavek’s brief:

Diana Belohlavek is currently the VP for Knowledge Management & Communication at The Unicist Research Institute.
Her postgraduate studies were in research methodologies at The Unicist Corporate University.
One of the personal interests that has influenced her professional career the most has been the study of myths from an anthropological point of view.
She was a swimmer and a triathlete. Her research work has allowed her to integrate her competitive experience in sports with her personal development and institutional management.
Diana Belohlavek is a member of the Executive Committee of The Unicist Research Institute and the Unicist Confederation. She is also member of the Unicist Confedertion’s Partners Admission Committee.
She is a lecturer in the field of unicist technologies and unicist thinking. She is a member of the Organizing Committee of the Unicist International Conferences.

Main books published:

– The Nature of Intelligence
– The Nature of Ethical Intelligence in Business
– Reading the Nature of Reality
– Unicist Talent Development
– Unicist Ontology of Competitiveness
– Unicist Knowledge Management in the Mining Industry
– Unicist Knowledge Management in Health Care
– The Unicist Ontology of Human Capital Building
– Unicist X-treme Design (Unicist Back2Back Methodology)

She has been the project leader of several research projects. She is currently leading research projects in the field of knowledge acquisition and its implicit fallacies and myths.

Executive Committee

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute is the major research organization in the world in its specialty based on more than 3,000 researches in complexity science applied to individual, institutional and social evolution. The applicative researches are based on the discovery of the Ontogenetic Intelligence of Nature and the consequent Unicist Theory of Evolution.


Are you changing your Organizational Design? Build your Japanese Park

The unicist ontology for organizational design provides the structure of the organizational process to be used when a business starts or a big change is being implemented.

By just implementing the first step of the Unicist Organizational Design you will know how big the change is.

Steps of the Organizational Process

1) Japanese Park: The first step to define the limits of the environment is letting things work in a natural way.

This demonstrates the functionality of the context and allows defining the possibilities of what needs to be designed. When the values shown by the environment are extremely far away from what is needed the organizational process cannot be implemented.

2) It is necessary to clarify the benefits of the parts involved in a working process. Both the organizational benefit and the personal benefits need to be approached in a “hypothetical” way. This step establishes the expectations of the parts involved.

3) The responsibilities of the parts need to be defined within the limits of the capacity of the individuals to assume them. When it is necessary to develop “maximal strategies” one must consider the capacity of managing risks, of managing uncertainty and the frustration capacity of the participants. The design has to be based on the capacity of individuals to assume the responsibility.

4) The methodology of the work processes defines the logic that needs to be used. This methodology needs to be known before the individuals begin to generate benefits for the organization and for themselves. These methodologies need to be adequate to the level of the participants.

5) The confirmation of the benefits implies that the individuals know the benefits that need to be produced for the organization and for them. The “Minimum Strategies” can only be designed after this has become transparent.

6) Manage the possibility of minimizing costs to ensure the minimum strategy. The objective of this step is to confirm that the costs are within the limits of a minimum strategy.

7) Define the use value of the organization in its unit without considering the different subsystems or individuals that integrate it. It has to be defined what it is that the organization needs to achieve and how this objective will be fulfilled.

8) Define the methods to be used in the organization and how the use of the methods will be measured. The methods need to include the quality assurance and / or quality control system.

9) The cost of the solution that is being designed needs to be confirmed. This implies redefining alternatives that allow cost reductions that do not modify the structure of the organization. This necessarily drives to redefining the previously defined stages seeking for cost reductions.

10) Making the pilot tests. Both destructive and non-destructive pilot tests need to be used. The first test has to be the destructive test in order to be aware of the limits of the validity of the solution.

Japanese Park – The first step

By just observing how the system is spontaneously managed you will know the distance between what happens today and the necessary functionality. This distance defines the size of the change to be implemented.

If the distance is small, just continue with the steps of the organizational design. If the distance is big, a valid change management technology is needed.

If a big change technology is needed, but left aside, the possibility of making a successful change is inhibited.

Diana Belohlavek
VP Knowledge Management
& Communication


Unicist Standard Language for Conceptual Engineering

Conceptual design requires making an ontological reverse engineering process. “Copy and paste” is the solution for cloning but not for designing. The Unicist Standard is necessary to develop this conceptual engineering approach.

The Use of the Unicist Standard Language is required to make an accurate conceptual design in engineering.

“Dealing with Human Adaptive Systems necessarily is driven by complexity. Adaptive systems are complex in themselves but dealing with human adaptive systems adds a new complex component which is the ambiguity implicit in human behavior.

The existence of conscious and non-conscious aspects of human behavior produces naturally the existence of an ambiguous environment.

The purpose of adaptive system management is to influence human adaptive systems using the object driven technologies included in the Unicist Standard.

The development of the Unicist Standard Language was necessary to provide a context in order to understand, communicate and influence the management of human adaptive systems.”

Learn more about the Unicist Standard watching the video that is available at: http://www.unicist.org/iua.shtml

Request more information: n.i.brown@unicist.org

Diego Belohlavek
Expert System Manager

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute is the major research organization in the world in its specialty based on more than 3,000 researches in complexity science applied to individual, institutional and social evolution. The applicative researches are based on the discovery of the Ontogenetic Intelligence of Nature and the consequent Unicist Theory of Evolution.

Follow us on twitter